
FSP
FEB 2026
Structuring an attorney fee deferral on a $2 million contingency fee
CASE STUDY DETAILS
The opportunity in a contingency fee
When a plaintiff attorney earns a significant contingency fee, the default is often to take the full amount at settlement. In California, one of the highest-tax states, a high earner could lose roughly 54.1% of the fee to federal and state income tax before investing a single dollar (37% federal tax, 13.3% state tax, 3.8% NIIT).
A hypothetical comparison
Prospera modeled a $2 million contingency fee earned by a hypothetical California plaintiff attorney, comparing three strategies: - Fee deferral: defer the fee and invest the full pre-tax amount, with taxes on the fee and gains deferred until distributions are paid. - Immediate receipt: take the fee at settlement, pay taxes, and invest the after-tax proceeds. - Indexed annuity: direct the proceeds into an indexed annuity. The analysis assumed a 10-year horizon and an aggressive allocation with a projected annual return of 7.46%.
The results
Fee deferral produced the strongest projected outcome. After taxes, the deferred fee was projected to generate $2,488,390, compared with $1,908,586 for immediate receipt. That’s nearly $580,000 more in after-tax wealth from the same fee. The indexed annuity projected an after-tax value of $1,927,806, ahead of immediate receipt but short of fee deferral.



